Skip to main content

India: bottom of “good” lists, top of “bad” lists … WHY?

The cover story in Business & Economy, “Why India Ranks Near Bottom in Global Lists,” evaluates some lists in which India ranks poorly:
  • Corruption Perception Index
  • Digital Opportunity Index
  • Environmental Performance Index (worse than countries like Vietnam and Gabon; scores on sanitation and indoor air pollution, for example, are among the world’s worst)
  • Global Hunger Index (41.6% live below povery line, according to World Bank)
  • Global Gender Gap Index
  • Global Democracy Index
  • Global Peace Index
  • Global Competitiveness Index (improved lately, but still behind countries like Tunisia)
  • Globalization Index
  • Human Development Index
  • Information and Communication Technology environment and readiness rank (Iran, Maldives, and Sri Lanka score better)
  • Gini Coefficient
  • Index of Economic Freedom
  • International Tax Misery & Reform Index
  • The Environmental Sustainability Index
  • Trade & Development Index (ranked below countries like Moldova and Uganda)
Based on ”Illicit Financial Flows” by Global Financial Integrity (a program of the Center for International Policy), The Times of India reports that India is Number 5 in this “bad” list, with about $27 billion dollars flowing out of the country illegally every year.

What’s going on here?

People in India frequently point fingers at “corrupt Governments” (in just one State, the poor paid nearly 1 billion Rupees (20 million US dollars) bribe last year to get public services). But The Times of India (Sep 23, 2008) reported that 1200 companies listed on domestic stock exchanges cooked accounts.

Indian author Shobhaa De, in her column “Politically Incorrect” in The Times of India mentions “an ocean of corruption,” which to her is “the real and only curse in India.”

If corruption is present in Businesses besides Governments, might it be present in other “places” that we haven’t probed yet?

Would that discovery show us what’s fundamentally wrong? And therefore lead us to a potential Solution?

First posted in WordPress on April 27, 2009


Popular posts from this blog

Explorer mentality Vs conqueror mentality

A fixation on competitors and on beating them is evidence of what Amazon's Jeff Bezos calls a conqueror mentality. In contrast, people waking up in the morning thinking how to innovate for the customer -- and having intense fun innovating -- is evidence of an explorer mentality.

The explorer mentality resulted in Amazon allowing negative reviews of its products. Reacting to this, a book publisher objected, saying "You make money when you sell things." But Bezos thought, "We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help customers make purchase decisions." So explorer mentality also demands a willingness to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

During his 16 years as CEO, Bezos' Amazon has delivered shareholder returns of 12,266% (industry-adjusted), and the company's value has grown by $111 billion. More in HBR Jan-Feb 2013.

M&A perspective: IT staffing Vs IT consulting

This report is a simple analysis by HT Capital -- a boutique investment banking firm in New York. It basically makes the point that being a staffing company (Vs consulting company) does not provide adequate returns to most investors, especially from an M&A perspective.

Peter Rozsa, co-author of the report, is a Senior Managing Director at HT Capital. He was also my "classmate" at a Columbia Business School executive education program. I have Peter's permission to make the report available here.

Click to download PDF report.

Leading Change Vs. "Leading" Status Quo

Change and Status quo can be as far apart from each other as a butterfly is from a caterpillar ...

Or ... as an is from a K-Mart ... Or ... as a BMW is from a Hyundai ... Or ... as laying a runway is from paving a cow path ... Or ... as a solution is from a product ... Or ... as experience is from service ... Or ... as customer success is from customer satisfaction ... Or ... as a distinct brand-you is from a me-too employee ...

Change can be triggered by innovation. Change can happen in corporate culture. And so on. There is a leader "behind" every Change. If you consider the corporate world, people like Lou Gerstner, Michael Dell, and Jack Welch may come to mind. Actually, there are scores of other lesser-known and unknown leaders that make change happen in their organizations.

Here's my question: What are some differences between those who lead change and those who "lead" the Status quo? Oh yes, we know about the staggering percentage of Change i…