Skip to main content

"Done to me" Vs "Done by me"

Not everyone sees Change as bad. People see Change as good or bad depending on whether they or someone else initiates it.

Rosabeth Moss Kanter (Harvard Business School professor and author of SuperCorp: How Vanguard Companies Create Innovation, Profits, Growth, and Social Good) observes that Change is "always a threat when done to me, but it is an opportunity when done by me."

In her HBR Voices article, Rosabeth continues "Many people hate change because it is inflicted on them; someone else is making them do it. On the other hand, people change all the time and love it, because they go after something they want - a new venture, a new book, a new spouse, a new baby, a new home, a new career step. In fact, when change is someone's chance to act on personal goals, it is not even called change. It is just my project."

Do you think this simple observation is a helpful tool for Change leaders?

Comments

  1. Fabulous Post!

    What it means to me is that people will make the change if they are

    a) convinced of the need for the change and
    b) of the benefit it will bring them as individuals and
    c) if they have (or least seem to have) a genuine say in deciding the shape of the change.

    All of the above must happen for them to take the plunge.

    As change managers, we need to attempt to achieve the above. To do that we must (corresponding to each of the points above)

    a) Try to get buy-in for the change bottom up…so many change initiatives fail because it is pushed top down…if Rosabeth Moss Canter is right, then we have no choice but to get bottom up buy in.

    b) We need to ensure that we can articulate the benefit for that individual as a result of the change. So, saying ´This is great for our company´ or that ´It will make our jobs easier´ are insufficient. It has to be ´You will benefit from the change in these ways´

    c) Lastly, involving the individual in shaping the change. If you are implementing a new software application, get the user community involved and not just the managers. Let them feel they are doing the project and they are deciding the functionality. Then, if Rosabeth Moss Canter is right, they will view the new ERP project at work just like they view buying a new LCD TV at home.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Explorer mentality Vs conqueror mentality

A fixation on competitors and on beating them is evidence of what Amazon's Jeff Bezos calls a conqueror mentality. In contrast, people waking up in the morning thinking how to innovate for the customer -- and having intense fun innovating -- is evidence of an explorer mentality.

The explorer mentality resulted in Amazon allowing negative reviews of its products. Reacting to this, a book publisher objected, saying "You make money when you sell things." But Bezos thought, "We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help customers make purchase decisions." So explorer mentality also demands a willingness to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

During his 16 years as CEO, Bezos' Amazon has delivered shareholder returns of 12,266% (industry-adjusted), and the company's value has grown by $111 billion. More in HBR Jan-Feb 2013.

Before you watch another news report, watch this whistleblower

If the leftist media was biased back in 2001, it is an outright mafia today Bernard Goldberg, a 28-year-veteran at leftist media outlet CBS, has exposed the "pettiness, hypocrisy, and bias inside CBS ... Just turn on your TV set and it’s there … but it’s there too often in too many stories."

Shockingly, you see not only political bias, but social bias as well.

In both political and social topics, the leftist media puts out content that dupes both loyalists and new-comers. Why are they so biased: self-serving purposes such as ratings and manipulation for votes.

Goldberg exposes the leftist media.
Manipulation Leftist media constantly attempts to manipulate people's mind with the following tricks.

1. They lie. Or misinform.

2. They hide certain things, as though these things did not exist or did not matter.

3. They won’t let the other voices be heard. More recently, author Sharyl Attkisson was not allowed to freely air segments that exposed Obama scandals such as Operation…

M&A perspective: IT staffing Vs IT consulting

This report is a simple analysis by HT Capital -- a boutique investment banking firm in New York. It basically makes the point that being a staffing company (Vs consulting company) does not provide adequate returns to most investors, especially from an M&A perspective.

Peter Rozsa, co-author of the report, is a Senior Managing Director at HT Capital. He was also my "classmate" at a Columbia Business School executive education program. I have Peter's permission to make the report available here.

Click to download PDF report.