Skip to main content

"Done to me" Vs "Done by me"

Not everyone sees Change as bad. People see Change as good or bad depending on whether they or someone else initiates it.

Rosabeth Moss Kanter (Harvard Business School professor and author of SuperCorp: How Vanguard Companies Create Innovation, Profits, Growth, and Social Good) observes that Change is "always a threat when done to me, but it is an opportunity when done by me."

In her HBR Voices article, Rosabeth continues "Many people hate change because it is inflicted on them; someone else is making them do it. On the other hand, people change all the time and love it, because they go after something they want - a new venture, a new book, a new spouse, a new baby, a new home, a new career step. In fact, when change is someone's chance to act on personal goals, it is not even called change. It is just my project."

Do you think this simple observation is a helpful tool for Change leaders?


  1. Fabulous Post!

    What it means to me is that people will make the change if they are

    a) convinced of the need for the change and
    b) of the benefit it will bring them as individuals and
    c) if they have (or least seem to have) a genuine say in deciding the shape of the change.

    All of the above must happen for them to take the plunge.

    As change managers, we need to attempt to achieve the above. To do that we must (corresponding to each of the points above)

    a) Try to get buy-in for the change bottom up…so many change initiatives fail because it is pushed top down…if Rosabeth Moss Canter is right, then we have no choice but to get bottom up buy in.

    b) We need to ensure that we can articulate the benefit for that individual as a result of the change. So, saying ´This is great for our company´ or that ´It will make our jobs easier´ are insufficient. It has to be ´You will benefit from the change in these ways´

    c) Lastly, involving the individual in shaping the change. If you are implementing a new software application, get the user community involved and not just the managers. Let them feel they are doing the project and they are deciding the functionality. Then, if Rosabeth Moss Canter is right, they will view the new ERP project at work just like they view buying a new LCD TV at home.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Business model intimacy

The Grameen Bank success story continues to be researched and written about. Other companies have tried to repeat the Bank's model. Is there a fundamental difference between the original innovation and the followers? In MIT Sloan Management Review (Summer 2009), Erik Simanis and Stuart Hart compare the original model with that of India-based Hindustan Unilever's model and point out a crucial difference.

Grameen Bank was a result of personal bond and shared vision between Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus and Bangladeshi farmers/villagers. Yunus and the villagers spent quality time together as a community before the innovator launched the bank. While Grameen Bank became a profitable and scalable village bank, the authors say that Hindustan Unilever's project is "unlikely to grow into anything more than a new distribution channel." While Grameen Bank generated a "groundswell" of demand," Hindustan Unilver's entrepreneur turnov…

clinton/obama/media cabal to be exposed starting june14

A lot of people have surrendered themselves to be constantly duped by leftist media outlets.

The duped people now believe things that are entirely different from facts – as regards the obama/clinton/media cabal.

For the duped leftists, the coming Inspector General (IG) reports and follow-up actions (assuming they're both carried out unobstructed) will be a shock.

The shock will be so powerful, the duped leftists may react in insane and dangerous ways. (Well, they've already been behaving in such ways, but they've been doing so for a different set of reasons and largely unaware of facts.)

Broadly, the IG reports are going to be about treasonous/ unconstitutional/ illegal activities, power abuses, and obstructions for the purpose of:

1. Exonerating a criminal Hillary

2. Covering up the crimes of the Clinton folks

3. Attempts to block a presidential candidate

4. Attempts at a coup against a constitutionally elected president

5. Obstruction of presidential duties

6. Public deception…

Elon's April 1 tweets: part of an emerging leadership style?

First his tweets and then my comments ...

Tesla Goes Bankrupt
Palo Alto, California, April 1, 2018 -- Despite intense efforts to raise money, including a last-ditch mass sale of Easter Eggs, we are sad to report that Tesla has gone completely and totally bankrupt. So bankrupt, you can't believe it. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2018
There are many chapters of bankruptcy and, as critics so rightly pointed out, Tesla has them *all*, including Chapter 14 and a half (the worst one). — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2018
Elon was found passed out against a Tesla Model 3, surrounded by "Teslaquilla" bottles, the tracks of dried tears still visible on his cheeks.

This is not a forward-looking statement, because, obviously, what's the point?

Happy New Month! — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2018
Almost all commenters appear to love Elon's April 1 tweets. But one person commented "CEOs of public companies shouldn't be putting out tw…