Skip to main content

What should you target: Excellence? Or the fast-and-cheap?

  ?

Note: I first wrote this article for a Nasscom blog

Tom Peters and numerous others have been nudging organizations and individuals to pursue excellence. Result? Discoveries. Innovations. Change. Customer value. Better employee satisfaction. Progress. Advancement.

Today, we’re seeing what some might consider a disturbing trend. This is the peddling of the “fast and cheap” (jugaad) as you see in this BusinessWeek article.

Comments on that article suggest that most disagree with the “fast and cheap.” And comments on a Seth Godin post at TomPeters.com clearly and completely support excellence.

Pursuit-of-the-fast-and-cheap clearly delivers some advantages. But businesses should also be aware of the downside by listening to warnings such as those given by Ross B-School professor M. S. Krishnan: “Jugaad means ‘Somehow, get it done,’ even if it involves corruption … Companies have to be careful. They have to pursue jugaad with regulations and ethics in mind.”

Are you concerned that “fast and cheap” might take us back in time — and therefore away from EXCELLENCE?

If not, do you think the current economic times justify it, as claimed by the authors/promoters of the “fast and cheap”?

Comments

  1. I think both the concepts will (and should) co-exist. The innovators will bring niche and often expensive products/services to the market. These are the products that challenge status quo and define our tomorrow. And eventually, these products will be replicated fastly and cheaply by the manufacturing gurus, making these products affordable in the mass. The latter cannot exist without the former and the former has little meaning without the latter.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Explorer mentality Vs conqueror mentality

A fixation on competitors and on beating them is evidence of what Amazon's Jeff Bezos calls a conqueror mentality. In contrast, people waking up in the morning thinking how to innovate for the customer -- and having intense fun innovating -- is evidence of an explorer mentality.

The explorer mentality resulted in Amazon allowing negative reviews of its products. Reacting to this, a book publisher objected, saying "You make money when you sell things." But Bezos thought, "We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help customers make purchase decisions." So explorer mentality also demands a willingness to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

During his 16 years as CEO, Bezos' Amazon has delivered shareholder returns of 12,266% (industry-adjusted), and the company's value has grown by $111 billion. More in HBR Jan-Feb 2013.

M&A perspective: IT staffing Vs IT consulting

This report is a simple analysis by HT Capital -- a boutique investment banking firm in New York. It basically makes the point that being a staffing company (Vs consulting company) does not provide adequate returns to most investors, especially from an M&A perspective.

Peter Rozsa, co-author of the report, is a Senior Managing Director at HT Capital. He was also my "classmate" at a Columbia Business School executive education program. I have Peter's permission to make the report available here.

Click to download PDF report.

Leading Change Vs. "Leading" Status Quo

Change and Status quo can be as far apart from each other as a butterfly is from a caterpillar ...

Or ... as an Amazon.com is from a K-Mart ... Or ... as a BMW is from a Hyundai ... Or ... as laying a runway is from paving a cow path ... Or ... as a solution is from a product ... Or ... as experience is from service ... Or ... as customer success is from customer satisfaction ... Or ... as a distinct brand-you is from a me-too employee ...

Change can be triggered by innovation. Change can happen in corporate culture. And so on. There is a leader "behind" every Change. If you consider the corporate world, people like Lou Gerstner, Michael Dell, and Jack Welch may come to mind. Actually, there are scores of other lesser-known and unknown leaders that make change happen in their organizations.

Here's my question: What are some differences between those who lead change and those who "lead" the Status quo? Oh yes, we know about the staggering percentage of Change i…