Skip to main content

5 indicators that the IT-to-BT move will be quicker in 2012


Happy new year to you! And here are 5 indicators that 2012 will be a great year for the IT-to-BT move as well:
  1. Trend lines: Increasing interest in process centric organizations and Business Process Management point to business technology (BT) as the approach for technology initiatives.
  2. British Airways and other cases available: Companies are already on the path to BT. Check resources by Forrester Research.
  3. Wide interest in BT: In my IT-to-BT seminars, I have seen interest from a wide variety of audience groups: Nasscom.org's IT events, TiE.org's innovation events, engineering colleges, B-schools, and IT companies. CIO and business process communities in the US have attended Forrester's BT conferences and webinars.
  4. BT governance frameworks now available: Forrester, for example, has a framework for BT governance (the new equivalent of IT governance).
  5. BT software method now available: Teams can now "businessify" their software methodology so they can deliver business outcomes rather than just technology ... feel free to ask me how.
What benefits should we expect? Firstly, enterprises can get their BT dollar to produce desired business outcomes. Secondly, for teams, business software development can become creative work. Thirdly, providers can use this opportunity to differentiate themselves and impress their customer organizations with new value.

Let me know your thoughts on how we could together take this forward.

Comments

  1. This article is wonderful as it helps me to get the sort of information that i needed.I am thankful as i got your article when was searching Business process management

    ReplyDelete
  2. if its communicating with BT, then I whole heartedly agree.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Pradeep, Your thought leadership is bound by no heights - particularly in the sub-continent where innovation is purely reactive.....this is great envisionment for the future and eager to know more soon...Regards, Mukund.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Explorer mentality Vs conqueror mentality

A fixation on competitors and on beating them is evidence of what Amazon's Jeff Bezos calls a conqueror mentality. In contrast, people waking up in the morning thinking how to innovate for the customer -- and having intense fun innovating -- is evidence of an explorer mentality.

The explorer mentality resulted in Amazon allowing negative reviews of its products. Reacting to this, a book publisher objected, saying "You make money when you sell things." But Bezos thought, "We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help customers make purchase decisions." So explorer mentality also demands a willingness to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

During his 16 years as CEO, Bezos' Amazon has delivered shareholder returns of 12,266% (industry-adjusted), and the company's value has grown by $111 billion. More in HBR Jan-Feb 2013.

M&A perspective: IT staffing Vs IT consulting

This report is a simple analysis by HT Capital -- a boutique investment banking firm in New York. It basically makes the point that being a staffing company (Vs consulting company) does not provide adequate returns to most investors, especially from an M&A perspective.

Peter Rozsa, co-author of the report, is a Senior Managing Director at HT Capital. He was also my "classmate" at a Columbia Business School executive education program. I have Peter's permission to make the report available here.

Click to download PDF report.

Leading Change Vs. "Leading" Status Quo

Change and Status quo can be as far apart from each other as a butterfly is from a caterpillar ...

Or ... as an Amazon.com is from a K-Mart ... Or ... as a BMW is from a Hyundai ... Or ... as laying a runway is from paving a cow path ... Or ... as a solution is from a product ... Or ... as experience is from service ... Or ... as customer success is from customer satisfaction ... Or ... as a distinct brand-you is from a me-too employee ...

Change can be triggered by innovation. Change can happen in corporate culture. And so on. There is a leader "behind" every Change. If you consider the corporate world, people like Lou Gerstner, Michael Dell, and Jack Welch may come to mind. Actually, there are scores of other lesser-known and unknown leaders that make change happen in their organizations.

Here's my question: What are some differences between those who lead change and those who "lead" the Status quo? Oh yes, we know about the staggering percentage of Change i…