Skip to main content

Romney ... and BT

Something caught my attention while I was watching the Republican National Convention on TV. It was Romney's statement "I have a plan to create 12 million jobs."

I do not know whether the number is good and achievable, but I like the fact that he mentioned a clear and specific outcome. More importantly, he was spot on in choosing the metric ("jobs") that seems to matter the most to a lot of voters. Overall, it's like saying, "Invest in me (for four years) and I will create 12 million jobs."

Now, here's my point. Like voters, CEOs have been asking for outcomes too – specific, needed business outcomes from their investment in technology. IT teams and providers need to respond positively and "upgrade" to be able to specify, design for, and deliver business outcomes. That is when IT becomes BT.

Comments

  1. SPECIFIC? How is telling voters "see me after election about what specific tax loopholes I am going to close to cover trillions of dollars of debt" anything but specific? You either seem to hardly follow what is happening in US politics or incredibly partisan!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can't you see this post is about technology and that the election data is only an illustration? Regardless, it's a no-brainer that 'create 12 million jobs' is SPECIFIC while 'create jobs' is not.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Explorer mentality Vs conqueror mentality

A fixation on competitors and on beating them is evidence of what Amazon's Jeff Bezos calls a conqueror mentality. In contrast, people waking up in the morning thinking how to innovate for the customer -- and having intense fun innovating -- is evidence of an explorer mentality.

The explorer mentality resulted in Amazon allowing negative reviews of its products. Reacting to this, a book publisher objected, saying "You make money when you sell things." But Bezos thought, "We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help customers make purchase decisions." So explorer mentality also demands a willingness to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

During his 16 years as CEO, Bezos' Amazon has delivered shareholder returns of 12,266% (industry-adjusted), and the company's value has grown by $111 billion. More in HBR Jan-Feb 2013.

M&A perspective: IT staffing Vs IT consulting

This report is a simple analysis by HT Capital -- a boutique investment banking firm in New York. It basically makes the point that being a staffing company (Vs consulting company) does not provide adequate returns to most investors, especially from an M&A perspective.

Peter Rozsa, co-author of the report, is a Senior Managing Director at HT Capital. He was also my "classmate" at a Columbia Business School executive education program. I have Peter's permission to make the report available here.

Click to download PDF report.

Leading Change Vs. "Leading" Status Quo

Change and Status quo can be as far apart from each other as a butterfly is from a caterpillar ...

Or ... as an Amazon.com is from a K-Mart ... Or ... as a BMW is from a Hyundai ... Or ... as laying a runway is from paving a cow path ... Or ... as a solution is from a product ... Or ... as experience is from service ... Or ... as customer success is from customer satisfaction ... Or ... as a distinct brand-you is from a me-too employee ...

Change can be triggered by innovation. Change can happen in corporate culture. And so on. There is a leader "behind" every Change. If you consider the corporate world, people like Lou Gerstner, Michael Dell, and Jack Welch may come to mind. Actually, there are scores of other lesser-known and unknown leaders that make change happen in their organizations.

Here's my question: What are some differences between those who lead change and those who "lead" the Status quo? Oh yes, we know about the staggering percentage of Change i…