Skip to main content

Organizations need enterprise-grade user interfaces

In conventional user-centered design, the user interface (UI) is viewed as a medium for human-computer interaction, and so – the focus is on human factors and the goal pursued is usability. While usability is an important perspective, this approach is irrelevant for business application development because the UI of a business application is a business process.

PCD is a business process centric method to design the user interface of business applications. PCD requires you to view the application UI as business process and enables you to design it like you would a business process. The method helps:

  1. Design the business process in the application
  2. Distribute business activities across UI and system
  3. Optimize the screens and steps.

The resulting architecture is enterprise-grade and delivers improved business process and 20% to 30% higher process performance.

PCD is executed by a specially trained business analyst. Further details at screen-level are designed by conventional UX experts.

I created PCD and introduced it at Cognizant Technology Solutions in the early 2000s. PCD differentiated Cognizant in the marketplace and played a key role in the organization's fast growth. Further back in 1994-95, I learned the user-centric approach at University of California, Berkeley (Ext).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Explorer mentality Vs conqueror mentality

A fixation on competitors and on beating them is evidence of what Amazon's Jeff Bezos calls a conqueror mentality. In contrast, people waking up in the morning thinking how to innovate for the customer -- and having intense fun innovating -- is evidence of an explorer mentality.

The explorer mentality resulted in Amazon allowing negative reviews of its products. Reacting to this, a book publisher objected, saying "You make money when you sell things." But Bezos thought, "We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help customers make purchase decisions." So explorer mentality also demands a willingness to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

During his 16 years as CEO, Bezos' Amazon has delivered shareholder returns of 12,266% (industry-adjusted), and the company's value has grown by $111 billion. More in HBR Jan-Feb 2013.

M&A perspective: IT staffing Vs IT consulting

This report is a simple analysis by HT Capital -- a boutique investment banking firm in New York. It basically makes the point that being a staffing company (Vs consulting company) does not provide adequate returns to most investors, especially from an M&A perspective.

Peter Rozsa, co-author of the report, is a Senior Managing Director at HT Capital. He was also my "classmate" at a Columbia Business School executive education program. I have Peter's permission to make the report available here.

Click to download PDF report.

Leading Change Vs. "Leading" Status Quo

Change and Status quo can be as far apart from each other as a butterfly is from a caterpillar ...

Or ... as an Amazon.com is from a K-Mart ... Or ... as a BMW is from a Hyundai ... Or ... as laying a runway is from paving a cow path ... Or ... as a solution is from a product ... Or ... as experience is from service ... Or ... as customer success is from customer satisfaction ... Or ... as a distinct brand-you is from a me-too employee ...

Change can be triggered by innovation. Change can happen in corporate culture. And so on. There is a leader "behind" every Change. If you consider the corporate world, people like Lou Gerstner, Michael Dell, and Jack Welch may come to mind. Actually, there are scores of other lesser-known and unknown leaders that make change happen in their organizations.

Here's my question: What are some differences between those who lead change and those who "lead" the Status quo? Oh yes, we know about the staggering percentage of Change i…