NY Times senior editor admits (1) Leftist bias to influence election and (2) Sensationalism to make money
Leftist bias to influence electionNYT ... We tried to influence the election by portraying candidate Trump in biased light (as a crazy person with crazy policies), hoping that people wouldn’t vote for him
NYT … We cannot be objective ... we're widely known to be liberal/left-leaning
Sensationalism to make moneyNYT … We focused whole pages about Trump (during election) … We feel 90% of stuff was Trump … it’s too much
NYT ... We did that partly because leftists consider stuff about him as sensational … We provide readers what they WANT (so, anyone with half a brain can imagine that democrats/liberals/leftists want fake news; that's how intellectual they are)
NYT (and WaPo) … The main objective is to grab subscribers. You do that any way that you can.
NYT … Click-chasers, that’s what we are … it’s so ignoble
NYT … The last couple of years it’s changed for the bad
So ...After the previous expose, NYT Executive Editor Dean Baquet tried an excuse, saying Project Veritas picked a junior NYT guy.
What will Pulitzer winner Dean (yes, Pulitzer winner, like Obama was a Nobel winner !!!) say about this part 3 of the expose, in which a Senior Editor revealed the truth?