Skip to main content

Can anything good come from the user interface?

For the IT team that develops business applications, isn’t the UI the humblest and least interesting part of software? And for the typical UI practitioner, isn’t being a UI practitioner occasionally a humiliating experience? I’ve even heard a UI group head (VP of a US product company) say this at a conference: “I’ve been bruised and battered.” Haven’t we heard that when employers downsize, UI practitioners are often one of the first they let go?

More importantly, for the enterprise that invests in IT, isn’t the UI often one of the major pain areas? Enterprise staff struggle, lose productivity, and even stop using apps on which hundreds of thousands of dollars were spent. And to confirm, hasn’t Forrester Research reported that software products from even the top companies are poor on basic UI quality factors?

If so, isn’t the application UI actually a source of pain?

The answer is “NO” if the UI is viewed and implemented as business process. Decades of viewing the app UI simply as an interaction medium has pushed this important process element to the sidelines.

Yes. The app UI is business process.

Now, what GOOD can come from the UI if it is viewed and implemented as a business process? In IT initiatives, these are the basic benefits:
  • Process-UI alignment
  • 100% to 200% user productivity gains (over applications architected using traditional approaches).
These are advantages for the enterprise that invests in IT to achieve specific process performance objectives. And rightly so … don’t you think?

Originally posted in WordPress on January 21, 2008

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Explorer mentality Vs conqueror mentality

A fixation on competitors and on beating them is evidence of what Amazon's Jeff Bezos calls a conqueror mentality. In contrast, people waking up in the morning thinking how to innovate for the customer -- and having intense fun innovating -- is evidence of an explorer mentality.

The explorer mentality resulted in Amazon allowing negative reviews of its products. Reacting to this, a book publisher objected, saying "You make money when you sell things." But Bezos thought, "We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help customers make purchase decisions." So explorer mentality also demands a willingness to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

During his 16 years as CEO, Bezos' Amazon has delivered shareholder returns of 12,266% (industry-adjusted), and the company's value has grown by $111 billion. More in HBR Jan-Feb 2013.

M&A perspective: IT staffing Vs IT consulting

This report is a simple analysis by HT Capital -- a boutique investment banking firm in New York. It basically makes the point that being a staffing company (Vs consulting company) does not provide adequate returns to most investors, especially from an M&A perspective.

Peter Rozsa, co-author of the report, is a Senior Managing Director at HT Capital. He was also my "classmate" at a Columbia Business School executive education program. I have Peter's permission to make the report available here.

Click to download PDF report.

Corrupt media: lessons for better behavior

During the US election cycle, so-called "liberal" media outlets have been misleading the people of America and the world. They focused our attention on Trump's bad WORDS instead of on Clinton's bad ACTIONS. Even their polls and predictions were totally wrong.

Post-election, they continue to fuel division, violence, and racism.

US election reporting in India too has been hate-filled (Chidanand, for example).

In the midst of all this is a fresh, objective voice. Chetan Bhagat is not only an intellectual, but a rare truth-speaker. Here are 5 things he tells the elitist media:

You are not as smart as you thinkPeople are the keyUnfair criticism always backfiresDo not impose your views on othersGet out of the bubble.
Here's his original article.