Skip to main content

How about an Innovation Index to "predict" downturns?

"While Wall Street's mistakes may have triggered the financial crisis, the innovation shortfall helps explain why the collapse has been so broad," says Michael Mandel in his June 15, 2009 BusinessWeek article. He comes to that conclusion based on an analysis of innovation in America in the past decade. A driving fact: potential high-impact innovations in areas such as satellite-based Internet and drug development did not commercialize.

Mandel's analysis looks at some factors that indicate the presence or absence of important innovation:
  • Stock market
  • Trade balance in advanced technology products
  • Wages of college-educated workers
  • Venture capital investments
  • Death rates by age.
Each of these (mostly economy-related) factors has shortcomings as an innovation indicator, but taken together, they tell important stories such as "weaker-than-expected-innovation" as in Mandel's recent findings. Alan Greenspan, in a 2000 speech, said "We appear to be in the midst of a period of rapid innovation that is bringing with it substantial and lasting benefits to our economy." While the prediction may not be entirely accurate, the connection between innovation and economy is clear.

If so, can these indicators go into creating an Innovation Index that can be used to "predict" events of economy such as downturns?

In that pursuit, we could also borrow some ideas from The International Innovation Index, which measures a country's level of innovation. Produced jointly by three organizations including The Boston Consulting Group, this index is part of a large research study that looked at both the business outcomes of innovation and government's ability to encourage and support innovation. Innovation inputs included (a) government and fiscal policy, (b) education policy and (c) the innovation environment. Outputs included (a) patents, technology transfer, and other R&D results, (b) business performance such as labor productivity and total shareholder returns and (c) the impact of innovation on business migration and economic growth.

If a good innovation index can predict economic events, how early can it? How would the next decade be for Innovation Nation, America? Would there be life-transforming and economy-boosting innovations? Would the rate of commercialization of such key innovations pick up soon and shorten the current downturn?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Explorer mentality Vs conqueror mentality

A fixation on competitors and on beating them is evidence of what Amazon's Jeff Bezos calls a conqueror mentality. In contrast, people waking up in the morning thinking how to innovate for the customer -- and having intense fun innovating -- is evidence of an explorer mentality.

The explorer mentality resulted in Amazon allowing negative reviews of its products. Reacting to this, a book publisher objected, saying "You make money when you sell things." But Bezos thought, "We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help customers make purchase decisions." So explorer mentality also demands a willingness to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

During his 16 years as CEO, Bezos' Amazon has delivered shareholder returns of 12,266% (industry-adjusted), and the company's value has grown by $111 billion. More in HBR Jan-Feb 2013.

M&A perspective: IT staffing Vs IT consulting

This report is a simple analysis by HT Capital -- a boutique investment banking firm in New York. It basically makes the point that being a staffing company (Vs consulting company) does not provide adequate returns to most investors, especially from an M&A perspective.

Peter Rozsa, co-author of the report, is a Senior Managing Director at HT Capital. He was also my "classmate" at a Columbia Business School executive education program. I have Peter's permission to make the report available here.

Click to download PDF report.

Corrupt media: lessons for better behavior

During the US election cycle, so-called "liberal" media outlets have been misleading the people of America and the world. They focused our attention on Trump's bad WORDS instead of on Clinton's bad ACTIONS. Even their polls and predictions were totally wrong.

Post-election, they continue to fuel division, violence, and racism.

US election reporting in India too has been hate-filled (Chidanand, for example).

In the midst of all this is a fresh, objective voice. Chetan Bhagat is not only an intellectual, but a rare truth-speaker. Here are 5 things he tells the elitist media:

You are not as smart as you thinkPeople are the keyUnfair criticism always backfiresDo not impose your views on othersGet out of the bubble.
Here's his original article.