Skip to main content

How about an Innovation Index to "predict" downturns?

"While Wall Street's mistakes may have triggered the financial crisis, the innovation shortfall helps explain why the collapse has been so broad," says Michael Mandel in his June 15, 2009 BusinessWeek article. He comes to that conclusion based on an analysis of innovation in America in the past decade. A driving fact: potential high-impact innovations in areas such as satellite-based Internet and drug development did not commercialize.

Mandel's analysis looks at some factors that indicate the presence or absence of important innovation:
  • Stock market
  • Trade balance in advanced technology products
  • Wages of college-educated workers
  • Venture capital investments
  • Death rates by age.
Each of these (mostly economy-related) factors has shortcomings as an innovation indicator, but taken together, they tell important stories such as "weaker-than-expected-innovation" as in Mandel's recent findings. Alan Greenspan, in a 2000 speech, said "We appear to be in the midst of a period of rapid innovation that is bringing with it substantial and lasting benefits to our economy." While the prediction may not be entirely accurate, the connection between innovation and economy is clear.

If so, can these indicators go into creating an Innovation Index that can be used to "predict" events of economy such as downturns?

In that pursuit, we could also borrow some ideas from The International Innovation Index, which measures a country's level of innovation. Produced jointly by three organizations including The Boston Consulting Group, this index is part of a large research study that looked at both the business outcomes of innovation and government's ability to encourage and support innovation. Innovation inputs included (a) government and fiscal policy, (b) education policy and (c) the innovation environment. Outputs included (a) patents, technology transfer, and other R&D results, (b) business performance such as labor productivity and total shareholder returns and (c) the impact of innovation on business migration and economic growth.

If a good innovation index can predict economic events, how early can it? How would the next decade be for Innovation Nation, America? Would there be life-transforming and economy-boosting innovations? Would the rate of commercialization of such key innovations pick up soon and shorten the current downturn?


Popular posts from this blog

Explorer mentality Vs conqueror mentality

A fixation on competitors and on beating them is evidence of what Amazon's Jeff Bezos calls a conqueror mentality. In contrast, people waking up in the morning thinking how to innovate for the customer -- and having intense fun innovating -- is evidence of an explorer mentality.

The explorer mentality resulted in Amazon allowing negative reviews of its products. Reacting to this, a book publisher objected, saying "You make money when you sell things." But Bezos thought, "We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help customers make purchase decisions." So explorer mentality also demands a willingness to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

During his 16 years as CEO, Bezos' Amazon has delivered shareholder returns of 12,266% (industry-adjusted), and the company's value has grown by $111 billion. More in HBR Jan-Feb 2013.

"If you worry about your reputation you don't deserve to have one."

Nassim Nicholas Taleb 1/2:
If you worry about your reputation you don't deserve to have one. Let me add just a bit to Taleb's great quote ...

True reputation is earned based on your positive CONTRIBUTIONS to entities other than yourself and your family: employers, customers, industry, society, Church, country, world, whatever.

Ask yourself: What have I discovered, invented, shared, set up, or built that will be of significant value to another entity for some time?

Contributions are not about our title (director, VP, etc). It's nice to have a big title (I would like to have one, too). At best, titles make us and our family happy. But chasing after titles could be a sign of narcissism. Titles are rarely a trustworthy certificate of contribution. This is true today when titles are increasingly achieved through bootlicking, back-stabbing, even hijacking another's job.

Contributions have longer life. They cannot be erased overnight. Five hundred years after German professor…

Before you watch another news report, watch this whistleblower

If the leftist media was biased back in 2001, it is an outright mafia today Bernard Goldberg, a 28-year-veteran at leftist media outlet CBS, has exposed the "pettiness, hypocrisy, and bias inside CBS ... Just turn on your TV set and it’s there … but it’s there too often in too many stories."

Shockingly, you see not only political bias, but social bias as well.

In both political and social topics, the leftist media puts out content that dupes both loyalists and new-comers. Why are they so biased: self-serving purposes such as ratings and manipulation for votes.

Goldberg exposes the leftist media.
Manipulation Leftist media constantly attempts to manipulate people's mind with the following tricks.

1. They lie. Or misinform.

2. They hide certain things, as though these things did not exist or did not matter.

3. They won’t let the other voices be heard. More recently, author Sharyl Attkisson was not allowed to freely air segments that exposed Obama scandals such as Operation…