Skip to main content

The McCurry label: lack of CREATIVITY?

An Indian fast food restaurant in Malaysia has "beaten" McDonald's in a lawsuit. McCurry can now use the "Mc" in its name.

In many parts of the World, copying the West is common. I do not know whether it is deliberate, but some recent Indian examples that come to mind are Tata NANO (Vs Apple's iPod NANO) and Tata Indica VISTA (Vs Microsoft's Windows VISTA).

Is it fair to ride on somebody else's CREATIVITY and HARD WORK? Is such "copying" always an issue of deception? Or might it be a lack of creativity?

Comments

  1. It depends on how you view your creativity, your value system, your business or personal objectives and so on...

    if you are Linus Torvalds, you probably want the whole world to benefit from your creativity and so he let everyone ride on his creativity and hard work. That is why today most people in world can afford an operating system for their computers, that is as good or better than anything microsoft has come up with.

    if you are Mcdonalds, you probably want to own the prefix Mc, which does not seem to have taken a lot of creativity to come up with in the first place. I am more surprised why an Indian restaurant in Malaysia (which needs no introduction to Curry) would want to use the Mc name? It does represent some lack of creativity I agree...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Its a perceived totally different. If some idea is good, they why not reuse it...its the same reusable components that we talk of. If prefixing Mc to the name add a glitter and some repeat customers, they why not do it?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Explorer mentality Vs conqueror mentality

A fixation on competitors and on beating them is evidence of what Amazon's Jeff Bezos calls a conqueror mentality. In contrast, people waking up in the morning thinking how to innovate for the customer -- and having intense fun innovating -- is evidence of an explorer mentality.

The explorer mentality resulted in Amazon allowing negative reviews of its products. Reacting to this, a book publisher objected, saying "You make money when you sell things." But Bezos thought, "We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help customers make purchase decisions." So explorer mentality also demands a willingness to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

During his 16 years as CEO, Bezos' Amazon has delivered shareholder returns of 12,266% (industry-adjusted), and the company's value has grown by $111 billion. More in HBR Jan-Feb 2013.

M&A perspective: IT staffing Vs IT consulting

This report is a simple analysis by HT Capital -- a boutique investment banking firm in New York. It basically makes the point that being a staffing company (Vs consulting company) does not provide adequate returns to most investors, especially from an M&A perspective.

Peter Rozsa, co-author of the report, is a Senior Managing Director at HT Capital. He was also my "classmate" at a Columbia Business School executive education program. I have Peter's permission to make the report available here.

Click to download PDF report.

Leading Change Vs. "Leading" Status Quo

Change and Status quo can be as far apart from each other as a butterfly is from a caterpillar ...

Or ... as an Amazon.com is from a K-Mart ... Or ... as a BMW is from a Hyundai ... Or ... as laying a runway is from paving a cow path ... Or ... as a solution is from a product ... Or ... as experience is from service ... Or ... as customer success is from customer satisfaction ... Or ... as a distinct brand-you is from a me-too employee ...

Change can be triggered by innovation. Change can happen in corporate culture. And so on. There is a leader "behind" every Change. If you consider the corporate world, people like Lou Gerstner, Michael Dell, and Jack Welch may come to mind. Actually, there are scores of other lesser-known and unknown leaders that make change happen in their organizations.

Here's my question: What are some differences between those who lead change and those who "lead" the Status quo? Oh yes, we know about the staggering percentage of Change i…