Skip to main content

The early days of a company and the significance of your contribution

Note: A slightly different version of this article first appeared at a NASSCOM blog

More than 7.7 million results will display if you google today for “early days of the company.” Add to it the results for related phrases like “formative days,” “startup days,” and variants. The number is huge and it demonstrates the significance of “those” days. “Those” days are challenging. They are fun. More importantly, they play a shaping role. What you do “back then” determines what your company might become. Here are just three of several factors that can play such a future-impacting role …

Corporate credo
Take Johnson & Johnson’s credo, which is considered the world’s most powerful statement of business purpose. It declares the order of priority: Customers first, shareholders last. It was crafted in 1943, but continues to determine how the company is run. Four decades after it was first written, when seven people died of poisoning due to tampered Tylenol capsules, JnJ’s same-old credo helped CEO James Burke take an exemplary moral stance by recalling Tylenol across the US. While the company’s sales and market share temporarily nose-dived, JnJ later became one of the largest companies in the world.

Competitive differentiation
An example is the competitive differentiation I created at a company that is 80,000-person strong today. Back in the mid-late 90s, when it described itself as a “promising venture,” I introduced a professional user interface practice. Back then, North American customers were looking for this practice in their Indian vendors, but did not find. So, my employer was instantly differentiated versus the India-centric software players.

While a professional user interface practice may not have existed in India back then, it was thriving in the developed World. If so, how would you sustain the differentiation? Well, I did it through innovation — by advancing the practice to a business process centric approach.

Corporate culture
Whatever it is — be it innovation culture, employee-friendly culture, or sales oriented culture — the culture that is instilled during the formative days is likely to stay on. Take the culture that Robert Noyce instilled at Intel. He basically created a “factory of creativity.” Noyce encouraged an environment where people lived for their work and became absorbed in their company. In fact, this pattern of “work as a way of life” soon became the signature image of Silicon Valley.

Ask yourself
If you are an employee, in what ways are you contributing during your employer’s early days?

If you are the founder or CEO, in what ways are you recognizing and rewarding employees who contribute to your company’s critical early days?


Popular posts from this blog

Explorer mentality Vs conqueror mentality

A fixation on competitors and on beating them is evidence of what Amazon's Jeff Bezos calls a conqueror mentality. In contrast, people waking up in the morning thinking how to innovate for the customer -- and having intense fun innovating -- is evidence of an explorer mentality.

The explorer mentality resulted in Amazon allowing negative reviews of its products. Reacting to this, a book publisher objected, saying "You make money when you sell things." But Bezos thought, "We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help customers make purchase decisions." So explorer mentality also demands a willingness to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

During his 16 years as CEO, Bezos' Amazon has delivered shareholder returns of 12,266% (industry-adjusted), and the company's value has grown by $111 billion. More in HBR Jan-Feb 2013.

M&A perspective: IT staffing Vs IT consulting

This report is a simple analysis by HT Capital -- a boutique investment banking firm in New York. It basically makes the point that being a staffing company (Vs consulting company) does not provide adequate returns to most investors, especially from an M&A perspective.

Peter Rozsa, co-author of the report, is a Senior Managing Director at HT Capital. He was also my "classmate" at a Columbia Business School executive education program. I have Peter's permission to make the report available here.

Click to download PDF report.

Leading Change Vs. "Leading" Status Quo

Change and Status quo can be as far apart from each other as a butterfly is from a caterpillar ...

Or ... as an is from a K-Mart ... Or ... as a BMW is from a Hyundai ... Or ... as laying a runway is from paving a cow path ... Or ... as a solution is from a product ... Or ... as experience is from service ... Or ... as customer success is from customer satisfaction ... Or ... as a distinct brand-you is from a me-too employee ...

Change can be triggered by innovation. Change can happen in corporate culture. And so on. There is a leader "behind" every Change. If you consider the corporate world, people like Lou Gerstner, Michael Dell, and Jack Welch may come to mind. Actually, there are scores of other lesser-known and unknown leaders that make change happen in their organizations.

Here's my question: What are some differences between those who lead change and those who "lead" the Status quo? Oh yes, we know about the staggering percentage of Change i…