Skip to main content

Grateful for ... the Influencers

Courtesy: Carl Richards (

Happy Thanksgiving!

These are just a few of the many people who influenced me. I have used their insights and have seen those insights work every time.

Eliel Saarinen, the Finnish-American designer, architect, and city-planner. I'm not a big admirer of art nouveau, but Eliel's insight "Always design a thing by considering it in its next larger context" is something I have used so frequently for 25 years that I can almost write a booklet on how to apply it!

Tom Peters, whose passionate voice on Excellence is unmatched. Interestingly, his work that influenced me is not In Search of Excellence, but The Circle of Innovation.

Michael Hammer and James Champy, who moved our focus away from organizational groups to business processes. They talked about the value, use, and mis-use of IT in their mid-90s bestseller Reengineering the Corporation (contrast with the 2003 edition of Lean Thinking, where IT is first mentioned only in page 327).

Al Ries and Jack Trout, whose statements on brand extension are debated, but whose Positioning concept I frequently use in my world.

Kishore Padmanabhan, who at Tata Consultancy Services (1989) taught me how to draw a line (timeline, that is) and how to manage projects and teams.

Richard Anderson, my UC Berkeley instructor – his comment "Why not you?" on my assignment paper encouraged me to set up India's first usability lab and his continued mentoring helped me bring new learning to the IT industry in India. I suspect that I learned a few of his presentation techniques as well.

Gilbert Samuel, my 10th grade teacher, a rare forward-thinking person in India at that time, whose frustration with India's antiquated cars (the one based on Morris Oxford, for example) and antiquated thoughts and practices showed me the importance of change.

Edward Samuel, my grandad who constantly preached to me key Biblical ethics, illustrating with his own life experiences. I haven't met anyone of higher moral standards. The best part is he was a star in his profession, heading schools and always hunted by competing schools. Proof that "good guy" and "winner" can co-exist in the same person.

Forced to read locally-produced mediocre textbooks at school, going to college in 1981 was being set free! I spent hours every week day at what was then called the United States Information Service (library at the American embassy in Chennai). It was like discovering an entirely new galaxy! I knew what I was going to read and watch from that point forward. It was a decision I made and stuck to. Thanks to all the American pioneers and contributors whose works have positively influenced my thought and action for over 30 years!


Popular posts from this blog

Explorer mentality Vs conqueror mentality

A fixation on competitors and on beating them is evidence of what Amazon's Jeff Bezos calls a conqueror mentality. In contrast, people waking up in the morning thinking how to innovate for the customer -- and having intense fun innovating -- is evidence of an explorer mentality.

The explorer mentality resulted in Amazon allowing negative reviews of its products. Reacting to this, a book publisher objected, saying "You make money when you sell things." But Bezos thought, "We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help customers make purchase decisions." So explorer mentality also demands a willingness to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

During his 16 years as CEO, Bezos' Amazon has delivered shareholder returns of 12,266% (industry-adjusted), and the company's value has grown by $111 billion. More in HBR Jan-Feb 2013.

M&A perspective: IT staffing Vs IT consulting

This report is a simple analysis by HT Capital -- a boutique investment banking firm in New York. It basically makes the point that being a staffing company (Vs consulting company) does not provide adequate returns to most investors, especially from an M&A perspective.

Peter Rozsa, co-author of the report, is a Senior Managing Director at HT Capital. He was also my "classmate" at a Columbia Business School executive education program. I have Peter's permission to make the report available here.

Click to download PDF report.

Leading Change Vs. "Leading" Status Quo

Change and Status quo can be as far apart from each other as a butterfly is from a caterpillar ...

Or ... as an is from a K-Mart ... Or ... as a BMW is from a Hyundai ... Or ... as laying a runway is from paving a cow path ... Or ... as a solution is from a product ... Or ... as experience is from service ... Or ... as customer success is from customer satisfaction ... Or ... as a distinct brand-you is from a me-too employee ...

Change can be triggered by innovation. Change can happen in corporate culture. And so on. There is a leader "behind" every Change. If you consider the corporate world, people like Lou Gerstner, Michael Dell, and Jack Welch may come to mind. Actually, there are scores of other lesser-known and unknown leaders that make change happen in their organizations.

Here's my question: What are some differences between those who lead change and those who "lead" the Status quo? Oh yes, we know about the staggering percentage of Change i…