Skip to main content

"Un-Follow the leader"

"You sometimes hear "yes" to a question before you've even explained it," says Columbia Business School professor/scholar Michael Morris, who also runs a research lab in India. "It is great that people are so agreeable and eager to help, but, as a manager, I need my young programmers to propose how they think it should be done." Based on his experience and experiments in India, Professor Morris advices, "Un-Follow the leader."

Innovation requires people to assert their ideas, but folks in India know that most employees here – the newly hired, the senior, and all those in between – blindly align with their boss. Note that this alignment is not entirely out of respect for the boss or out of an unselfish attitude. Also, most bosses too support  – and even subtly impose – this culture becaue it helps them as well.

Unfortunately, the outcome of such employee-boss alignment is always mediocrity.

Couple of stories on how I avoided this dangerous tradition and how you can, too ...

Story 1

When my boss saw that the company's Western customers loved the user testing lab I had set up, he suggested that I build on that success by setting up a software testing lab as well. In fact, he encourged me, "We can make the necessary investments." [This, as you know, is a common fallacy – that similar things (departments) should be grouped together, but more on that in a later post.] My response was not "Thanks, I'm in!" My response was not even a politically correct "Sounds great, let me do some home work and get back to you," but a blunt, "No, I don't think that's a good idea because ... Let me know what you think of an idea I've been working on."

Back then in the late 90s, user perspective was one thing that customers missed in work done by tech-savvy Indian software teams. That is why they loved the user testing lab – so you don't want to mess that up. Sure, the boss found the people he needed to run a successful software testing lab, but what happened to my new idea? Well, I introduced a practice that while satisfying user needs brought a new perspective far more important to the customer organization: the business process perspective. This new practice delivered bigger successes for the company.

Story 2

When I asked my team's straight-out-of-college-newly-hireds, "What do you think?" they suspected I was evaluating them or something. They needed to be reassured by their colleagues that this is just the team's culture, which is based on the belief that people regardless of their seniority or position should think and can come up with useful ideas. The good news is: many of them not only adapted to this culture, but actually went on to dominate the world in their own area of specialization. Here's one example.

If it worked for me – and for my team members – it should work for you. So, go ahead and UnFollow your boss. Of course, you may want to continue to Follow your boss in Twitter!

Source: Columbia Ideas at Work, Winter 2013 (Professor Michael Morris' experiments)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Business model intimacy

Courtesy: NobelPrize.org
The Grameen Bank success story continues to be researched and written about. Other companies have tried to repeat the Bank's model. Is there a fundamental difference between the original innovation and the followers? In MIT Sloan Management Review (Summer 2009), Erik Simanis and Stuart Hart compare the original model with that of India-based Hindustan Unilever's model and point out a crucial difference.

Grameen Bank was a result of personal bond and shared vision between Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus and Bangladeshi farmers/villagers. Yunus and the villagers spent quality time together as a community before the innovator launched the bank. While Grameen Bank became a profitable and scalable village bank, the authors say that Hindustan Unilever's project is "unlikely to grow into anything more than a new distribution channel." While Grameen Bank generated a "groundswell" of demand," Hindustan Unilver's entrepreneur turnov…

clinton/obama/media cabal to be exposed starting june14

A lot of people have surrendered themselves to be constantly duped by leftist media outlets.

The duped people now believe things that are entirely different from facts – as regards the obama/clinton/media cabal.

For the duped leftists, the coming Inspector General (IG) reports and follow-up actions (assuming they're both carried out unobstructed) will be a shock.

The shock will be so powerful, the duped leftists may react in insane and dangerous ways. (Well, they've already been behaving in such ways, but they've been doing so for a different set of reasons and largely unaware of facts.)

Broadly, the IG reports are going to be about treasonous/ unconstitutional/ illegal activities, power abuses, and obstructions for the purpose of:

1. Exonerating a criminal Hillary

2. Covering up the crimes of the Clinton folks

3. Attempts to block a presidential candidate

4. Attempts at a coup against a constitutionally elected president

5. Obstruction of presidential duties

6. Public deception…

Elon's April 1 tweets: part of an emerging leadership style?

First his tweets and then my comments ...

Tesla Goes Bankrupt
Palo Alto, California, April 1, 2018 -- Despite intense efforts to raise money, including a last-ditch mass sale of Easter Eggs, we are sad to report that Tesla has gone completely and totally bankrupt. So bankrupt, you can't believe it. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2018
There are many chapters of bankruptcy and, as critics so rightly pointed out, Tesla has them *all*, including Chapter 14 and a half (the worst one). — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2018
Elon was found passed out against a Tesla Model 3, surrounded by "Teslaquilla" bottles, the tracks of dried tears still visible on his cheeks.

This is not a forward-looking statement, because, obviously, what's the point?

Happy New Month! pic.twitter.com/YcouvFz6Y1 — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2018
Almost all commenters appear to love Elon's April 1 tweets. But one person commented "CEOs of public companies shouldn't be putting out tw…