Skip to main content

What outcomes-driven is, What it is not

When I mention the oil-drilling model, one of the questions people frequently ask is, What do you really mean by business outcomes?

Business outcomes are targeted objectives in three areas:
  • Business process performance
  • Customer value (or another stakeholder value)
  • Corporate impact (financially or strategically).

So ...
  • Business outcomes in the context of the oil-drilling model is not about meeting project deadlines or conventional SLAs
  • Outcomes focus is not a blind pursuit of profit at all costs, although "improved profits" can be a targeted outcome
  • Outcomes focus is not about the traditional way of listing benefits to justify software spend.

Talk to me if you want to know how to define targeted business outcomes for your software project. You 'll find my contact in my profile on the right.

Comments

  1. Thanks Pradeep, this is a great innovative thought process. Gone are the days of investing heavily in the application landscape (the late 90s and the first decade of 2k saw a rise in applications. I can clearly understand there is a need to go back and question the AS-IS model to make sure funds do not flow to unknown zones. I am all the way curious to know how to take this message to end Clients. This is since, having invested billions & millions in setting up the processes, software & relative technology, hardware, etc - will there be any reluctance for a radical change and if so, how to break the traditional mind-set. Please suggest. Thanks, Mukund.

    ReplyDelete
  2. While resistance is always experienced, CHANGE still happens if it delivers new value. Remember the way customers were pleasantly surprised when they saw our business process centric approach to application UI design? There is no human progress without CHANGE. As you know, we have seen many s/w dev models since the first Waterfall model. Each new model was an advancement over the prev one in some ways.

    The goal we pursued was "Quality s/w on time within budget." We've become strong in achieving that goal. However, having seen thousands of business applications "wasted" because of poor alignment with business needs, Forrester CEO George Colony is championing a move to a "BT" age, where organizations will ensure business alignment BEFORE investing in implementation. The oil-drilling model is a method to achieve this new goal that software teams and organizations are expected to pursue going forward.

    Conventional SDLC is actually a technical implementation method and we do no change it. Instead, the oil-drilling model provides additional Business consulting steps to ensure you pack targeted business needs into an architecture that blends software and business change. So investments already made in s/w process are protected (and what has been missing in the IT era has been added).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Business model intimacy

Courtesy: NobelPrize.org
The Grameen Bank success story continues to be researched and written about. Other companies have tried to repeat the Bank's model. Is there a fundamental difference between the original innovation and the followers? In MIT Sloan Management Review (Summer 2009), Erik Simanis and Stuart Hart compare the original model with that of India-based Hindustan Unilever's model and point out a crucial difference.

Grameen Bank was a result of personal bond and shared vision between Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus and Bangladeshi farmers/villagers. Yunus and the villagers spent quality time together as a community before the innovator launched the bank. While Grameen Bank became a profitable and scalable village bank, the authors say that Hindustan Unilever's project is "unlikely to grow into anything more than a new distribution channel." While Grameen Bank generated a "groundswell" of demand," Hindustan Unilver's entrepreneur turnov…

clinton/obama/media cabal to be exposed starting june14

A lot of people have surrendered themselves to be constantly duped by leftist media outlets.

The duped people now believe things that are entirely different from facts – as regards the obama/clinton/media cabal.

For the duped leftists, the coming Inspector General (IG) reports and follow-up actions (assuming they're both carried out unobstructed) will be a shock.

The shock will be so powerful, the duped leftists may react in insane and dangerous ways. (Well, they've already been behaving in such ways, but they've been doing so for a different set of reasons and largely unaware of facts.)

Broadly, the IG reports are going to be about treasonous/ unconstitutional/ illegal activities, power abuses, and obstructions for the purpose of:

1. Exonerating a criminal Hillary

2. Covering up the crimes of the Clinton folks

3. Attempts to block a presidential candidate

4. Attempts at a coup against a constitutionally elected president

5. Obstruction of presidential duties

6. Public deception…

Elon's April 1 tweets: part of an emerging leadership style?

First his tweets and then my comments ...

Tesla Goes Bankrupt
Palo Alto, California, April 1, 2018 -- Despite intense efforts to raise money, including a last-ditch mass sale of Easter Eggs, we are sad to report that Tesla has gone completely and totally bankrupt. So bankrupt, you can't believe it. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2018
There are many chapters of bankruptcy and, as critics so rightly pointed out, Tesla has them *all*, including Chapter 14 and a half (the worst one). — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2018
Elon was found passed out against a Tesla Model 3, surrounded by "Teslaquilla" bottles, the tracks of dried tears still visible on his cheeks.

This is not a forward-looking statement, because, obviously, what's the point?

Happy New Month! pic.twitter.com/YcouvFz6Y1 — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) April 1, 2018
Almost all commenters appear to love Elon's April 1 tweets. But one person commented "CEOs of public companies shouldn't be putting out tw…