Skip to main content

Corporate ladder-climbing today: Akin to asset bubble build-up?

Ladder-climbing per se is not bad. Here we talk about the unqualified ladder-climber. Someone who's not ready for the next level. Someone whose ONLY pursuit in life is money and superficial status.

They will do anything for that promotion. Apple-polish their boss. Pretend to work hard. Provide false information about their performance or abilities. Plot and execute extreme office politics – even violence – to undermine or get rid of those they consider as competing "threats."

I'm ignorant about other industries, but I have observed it in India's software industry for 28 years. It gets worse all the time. And it leaves the smaller percent of qualified folks unhappy and wanting to leave the company or country. Bad for the company. The company that promotes unqualified folks will – sooner or later – become a company of dwarfs.

How about the promoter? Promoting someone who's not ready for the next level is bad. A form of corporate crony capitalism. Self-serving bosses allow – even encourage – such ladder-climbing ... some to the point of running a cartel of sorts, as in "You do this for me, I will do this for you ..."

The good news is that the pursuit of unqualified promotions will not last. People are going to ask, "who promoted this person that can't even ...?" Unqualified ladder-climbing will – like an asset bubble – burst at some point in time. And unqualified ladder-climbing will certainly not give peace and true happiness.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Explorer mentality Vs conqueror mentality

A fixation on competitors and on beating them is evidence of what Amazon's Jeff Bezos calls a conqueror mentality. In contrast, people waking up in the morning thinking how to innovate for the customer -- and having intense fun innovating -- is evidence of an explorer mentality.

The explorer mentality resulted in Amazon allowing negative reviews of its products. Reacting to this, a book publisher objected, saying "You make money when you sell things." But Bezos thought, "We don't make money when we sell things; we make money when we help customers make purchase decisions." So explorer mentality also demands a willingness to be misunderstood for long periods of time.

During his 16 years as CEO, Bezos' Amazon has delivered shareholder returns of 12,266% (industry-adjusted), and the company's value has grown by $111 billion. More in HBR Jan-Feb 2013.

M&A perspective: IT staffing Vs IT consulting

This report is a simple analysis by HT Capital -- a boutique investment banking firm in New York. It basically makes the point that being a staffing company (Vs consulting company) does not provide adequate returns to most investors, especially from an M&A perspective.

Peter Rozsa, co-author of the report, is a Senior Managing Director at HT Capital. He was also my "classmate" at a Columbia Business School executive education program. I have Peter's permission to make the report available here.

Click to download PDF report.

Leading Change Vs. "Leading" Status Quo

Change and Status quo can be as far apart from each other as a butterfly is from a caterpillar ...

Or ... as an Amazon.com is from a K-Mart ... Or ... as a BMW is from a Hyundai ... Or ... as laying a runway is from paving a cow path ... Or ... as a solution is from a product ... Or ... as experience is from service ... Or ... as customer success is from customer satisfaction ... Or ... as a distinct brand-you is from a me-too employee ...

Change can be triggered by innovation. Change can happen in corporate culture. And so on. There is a leader "behind" every Change. If you consider the corporate world, people like Lou Gerstner, Michael Dell, and Jack Welch may come to mind. Actually, there are scores of other lesser-known and unknown leaders that make change happen in their organizations.

Here's my question: What are some differences between those who lead change and those who "lead" the Status quo? Oh yes, we know about the staggering percentage of Change i…